X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1B25EFDE-7583-48B6-BC32-578923EF9602"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: gEDA and it's future with Scheme & Guile was Re: [geda-user] Project leadership
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20160101194045.42795726@levivo>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 12:38:05 -0700
Message-Id: <DD66873C-D8D6-438A-8D3B-3B93126FE593@noqsi.com>
References: <CAM2RGhS4L-ch6FEcLtdSt0vA0BdQZvq+AuFDP+9ea7Ftd=AALg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAMvDHVATJYfLUkL+5AkD31BVTbg5OdKTvZc2LVh=7Kf6Y-95EA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAD2FfiHeUtsRWtYENR-LX=DuSHWw3AEtmeCLbb40x9gUcYnjmw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5683FC1D DOT 4060006 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20151231021438 DOT 0FA26809D79D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160101194045 DOT 42795726 AT levivo>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_1B25EFDE-7583-48B6-BC32-578923EF9602
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Jan 1, 2016, at 11:40 AM, Levente Kovacs (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via =
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 03:14:37 +0100 (CET)
> karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
>=20
>> If I'd choose, I'd have libgeda in c only, because that what I
>> know best.
>>=20
>> That said, I'm somewhat surprised about the "we don't want scheme"
>> emphasis expressed in this mailing list.
>>=20
>> Look at a in some ways similar project: http://www.lilypond.org/
>> They use c/c++/python/scheme with scripting in scheme only, and they
>> are successful at it.
>=20
> I doubt that. I was having real hard time compiling lilypond on =
FreeBSD,
> because they stick to older version of Guile. I was talking with the =
their
> project leader, and he said they still struggling to upgrade to Guile =
2.0,
> but Guile developers are unfriendly. They are also having hard time =
because of
> Guile.

=93Can users deal with Scheme scripting=94 is a different issue from =
=93can developers deal with Guile integration=94. I think we=92ve had =
adequate success here, but I am aware of the difficulties. Perhaps Xorn =
will liberate us. But perhaps not.

>=20
> Lev
>=20
>=20

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_1B25EFDE-7583-48B6-BC32-578923EF9602
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=DAhO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_1B25EFDE-7583-48B6-BC32-578923EF9602--