X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 00:20:41 -0400 Message-Id: <201510250420.t9P4Kfes017141@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20151024105936.3de408e6dfa2135be27cfb4a@gmail.com> (geda-user AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: [geda-user] support arcs with square ends?, ellipse segment arcs? References: <201510230205 DOT t9N25Fhv002633 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151024105936 DOT 3de408e6dfa2135be27cfb4a AT gmail DOT com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > As is now arcs for 90 degrees work well but ideally arc angle should > depend on connecting lines, did I understand this correct? Arcs with arbitrary start/end angles are already supported, and used by the pullers and toporouter.