X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=s2svEM8IRvpqrIuUmq+Ea48O9fLJLfsAJsr0M68xUqs=;
        b=gu6ZcW/+TAXl8e9l4JDCOUCoqcVBnzQuMW8cUNzrN9nbqLTRgJo41E6eXm0kTR1IM0
         7YHJz3ZRhvqGVrheFbAm0XBCszwGbxSjZDo48heRDWXzWV0B7cPD2pN1aIOJ8yDqts9t
         56u+PYlerLJFTlM5cKBIJ8tMnOMeb7jU9NPcAHCgt2u/n/coBWdx1VfYpULIZ/+JxPia
         Xb95YM9he6Y1AG3pbDprPxXTcwIgspBQa94wzpA1j552TWb0C9pMa2LE1YgVapUIg9Pl
         pQ//pHGjcGYPEv1fgqLT0N+/PREUQPyNI7OR0Awx4h4GyiYsTMmIsYTXUuqpt3ChqEZl
         F/qw==
X-Received: by 10.194.222.227 with SMTP id qp3mr17695565wjc.36.1445497392170;
        Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:03:10 +0200
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
Message-Id: <20151022090310.d3dc512da6760471f9777706@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhQOpnBXbZXngNq=RcQTZN=UrU+PGzTZ9AC=xKNfu_zQkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com>
	<34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhR+K+dvDdXsbk0Y6LN=-7RhhG5wvtG4i0k4+uMgzd=H0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510210954 DOT 46552 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
	<CAM2RGhTg=nT4aXqdiRz+OmHJ3WiMJntiTZyOH3AdFBZ8dEyT4w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<DA7D969B-6516-4633-831C-FFADA38E1807 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRN5S1KZCNFQwoVTPg3=mC5xrK2z9XTOpWwPuF0iVS+Rg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSvpVvboJ-gdyrojAzggFEBnAr30CKNQBefjci-PA1n6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQhNkShqtN8uyCSd7R+V4FgLXDZTvTC2RTdmKF7C_8ndA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQOpnBXbZXngNq=RcQTZN=UrU+PGzTZ9AC=xKNfu_zQkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:36 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> >
> >> Would you really do it that way or would you have two different nets
> >> that meet in a specific way?
> >
> > It's amazing how "obvious" it is to just put in an AGND and a DGND
> > symbol and connect them together...
> 
> I can't tell if you like this idea or are mocking it. Disadvantage of email.
> Ether way mixing the two netnames one schematic would enable a lot of
> ambiguity about where the two meet. Typically when I two grounds and
> they are connected it is in a very controlled way.

Symbolically it could be deon with an n pin zero ohm resistor or other symbol. In layout a special footprint with one connection point could do the trick.

Nicklas Karlsson