X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=jGIKVk9R6f8ufQ4ohJvp4+T/kEVx3h3CVoY7ROYBKQw=; b=QAc/2H7ssBG3BxtMR2KPpB2MwOBNclTS1xOHEc348nFVxtXrr+p6BCCgO02whqqnZm b2T0Dpb1r9LkrKXuciRMX/xWeFwaURL9axZ1+kY9QiwrHUJgu3AqcdNhNKAdytSmG+r9 Ynd4oPniN3ScAvXv/t8AeWXPJ7sjs2TXHUnm0SKLdAJOKn5iU44ep+ygIB+RtGMCTJES u6WFRvljKRGrpY86SBXvNuBjpeFU9EXhmU5PCnOa7yEY/SvtaPP1ryRWHWHtyATzQC2U FfBM7uHvCnVlIcopswC9tS6A18l3qeKHXZh6yNiFxPClCUI8BAzYf+NZITQMG7hkAFT7 N5ug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.180.230 with SMTP id dr6mr6995221lbc.72.1445479423628; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:03:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201510220149.t9M1nrIe016145@envy.delorie.com> References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <201510210954 DOT 46552 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com> <201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220149 DOT t9M1nrIe016145 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 02:03:43 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:49 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I can't tell if you like this idea or are mocking it. > > Can't it be both? It would be great if you could just connect two Ok > nets like that and have the system remember the topology long enough > to DTRT in layout. But in gEDA, this type of connection only results > in an error. Well I was approaching that with the stuff I was talking about in the other thread but I realized there were fundamental issues with it. This is kind of why I was thinking about star grounds. Really this is a type of star topology. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/