X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yjopjidH9kQRU/+rYIg5RujWsXXP/Q0VR47IEjQRtyE=; b=vahapVHpRPURRdPsUFPihcHOMys0uU8CTa59fY6VoHeZt6vZjvAgMh6k1lk3sqvcQz 1OP3iAnX7FlgUYouRhsvYAk0DfXt483VXDg+lRdF+fcLt8bKCpj69XYFwbEEHd0RResb ksBQsZe6R6nS6X6878+ev3QA6HQz6lQx6ZVXyLQO0rOk1ZDekywn/5ukmW3Q3+VxCMYQ EepW8yFVxvc3cffCm+zBElnSp4HfjM/vFby2JDsWirT5bh8HkTYrAD0TJba3OxvyFOD5 ghy3y0Ai8x7yF3Y9U3+tzcQhmEF3x9s1mfD+5U9/AvArcdQ79bsPkYdBH8C4djptBoCA S9lg== X-Received: by 10.25.31.212 with SMTP id f203mr1735342lff.6.1445362340036; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:32:16 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile Message-ID: <20151020173216.GB16826@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com> <20151016213030 DOT GC2813 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56228E23 DOT 8060309 AT ecosensory DOT com> <2FAEEEF0-13A3-4F40-827C-4FAC04303B7F AT noqsi DOT com> <4E961FBD-9E20-4A8C-AE58-06E7902879F7 AT noqsi DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:03:36AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > John Doty wrote: > > >> No this is the "long term project maintenance requires a modest > >> developer base." Nothing in Kai-Martin's email said anything about > >> development just the availability of warm bodies who can contribute > >> something. > > > > But that hasn’t been a problem. > > > Yes it has. We lost the windows port of geda-gaf because of it. Because of what? Because of nobody wants to package it while I have a working Windows version for geda-gaf 1.9.2 on my machine at work?