X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_91994F00-E0EE-438C-9235-FBB5C5BD4BA5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:17:37 -0600 Message-Id: <4E961FBD-9E20-4A8C-AE58-06E7902879F7@noqsi.com> References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com> <4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com> <20151016213030 DOT GC2813 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56228E23 DOT 8060309 AT ecosensory DOT com> <2FAEEEF0-13A3-4F40-827C-4FAC04303B7F AT noqsi DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_91994F00-E0EE-438C-9235-FBB5C5BD4BA5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via = geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:11 PM, John Doty wrote: >>=20 >> On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak = wrote: >>=20 >>> In my humble opinion, this damages the project in >>> the long run. It already has done so since about 15 years. We see = the >>> result in the number of active developers of back-ends. >>=20 >> That=92s the =93development is a good thing=94 ideology. But in = reality, it=92s only a good thing if it=92s a good thing. In the early = days of gEDA, a variety of people wrote a variety of back ends. Is there = much need for more? There=92s more scope for plugins that *modify* back = end behavior, but we haven=92t really created that culture. On my todo = list. >=20 > No this is the "long term project maintenance requires a modest > developer base." Nothing in Kai-Martin's email said anything about > development just the availability of warm bodies who can contribute > something. But that hasn=92t been a problem. >=20 >> That said, I approve of new tools with new scripting languages and = paradigms. >=20 > +1 >=20 >> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >> http://www.noqsi.com/ >> jpd AT noqsi DOT com >>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Home > http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ > Work > http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ >=20 >=20 John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_91994F00-E0EE-438C-9235-FBB5C5BD4BA5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJaRBAAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRJUAP/0I22DHTm30aq4fKqPsesgqz PCMrGFq72A6PkvyXeTwZpLk6dz3Px+B+VtrkJvdmaCUiK1Qev3WDADrBMZKa0Wvb nbDuTg4CO5JrTyklaGeDU3AdjulUg2PpuyWgBMgwtIA2uEoBeHPW0EtwD1xYoIKk u8aCnE2DcKbCYdvqIzIVLyUCNBSf1K0qWJHrnsivLC7VoGFfsMfxjG/lvL3M+fp/ 17CnCTp71wX0yKA4QVMGU2I7VN9m1OYC8uJhGUGYm5lUuIg1oNdbeHM7VarkeWHh AmntE5QXjtWVsD57uKYOTv89p7sZ7n1d8EpQ44ugZ4B+P+gV3Cw1mpMjuSpQQoOI y5738lfoRbGN7aZv1g44TPBkulqzqBvQy2KFtCFQfS1IMPB5/6RjIZbk37lTpqKn w9M7kSipqh7cVeVtjE087sY5je6t7PzRgLeSufi4Ojm9Wsf7oBt0SYOgZniu8mkF qDY6/NZZZMxY/J5tIz0sir2zHEwSf2YwRUutuez2b/EYe5i7dNuv9f1sFTnnABCP Imp28bUYhfclFEAbLlWJIKpOpFqBEhaADEzxVXeux5nFteYbl+IOZtZ4eXybD3E7 bvMl23N8DV2ZnCXdYFlj8JbYhsobVmzjIF/bk742gfDTP/3hQ8sX10s/PjvAJniB 6JahJKgdtg+5O+d9aa8J =3VWv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_91994F00-E0EE-438C-9235-FBB5C5BD4BA5--