X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FngYLO/HWNaQJ1gsSrBOeFQYQXC8lAv/rav4d49BwkM=; b=CT6jqLwuXf6OLR4xrBG7yMB5Trim2XRVc0u2spa3CoGnr2dgNlCULo55VSeD1t1mtH OQtdjyrVUufKG2FSMbNARCjE80HSZdY588UBld088XpTGgnzO6uk4lmu1kX2iqpplNs3 7X6pGY1WyX6omQTaNkQavdODYu4GXp4mx7MvxB7mMR71w+LcXdkEX93AcVYOccbxRDYz 95LN4ITAZZ+uATpBnwcs/7QJQ/bP1/5Kj3d//h13vMRpRiReP9MKR0iAcZxJy/8PErvJ PhkSEWAtDrfo03QXU1KaiD1tokrbvHhbARwdl2vpjLEyaLC1CS6bTwfZaS4lGlC6tR/X cY0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.147.232 with SMTP id tn8mr14378425lbb.84.1445260967890; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:22:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com> <4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <39FF6208-7D45-4DE8-9AEE-1ED1B512705B AT noqsi DOT com> <20151018192444 DOT GB2782 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:22:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 18 October 2015 at 21:24, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> You've probably heard questions of our >> users on how to make some actions available without using gui, just >> using shortkeys for example. If we make all our main C functionality >> available to Scheme, it would be a big step forward and make some of >> those requests solved easily. > > I think this effort will make a difference. From my Cadence > experience, being able to script just about anything with their Lisp > justified the effort of learning their Lisp. The added bonus was that > their Lisp was used in scripting their waveform viewer, layout tool, > spice integration. A second key to success was their CIW, the command > interpreter window. In that window all Lisp code could be written > interactively and the evaluation would be visible in whatever window > was referenced from the code. Much like the REPL. Or ipython for > pythonists or tkcon for tclers. Have you tried to use what is already there? (not trying to pick a fight, just asking) > -- > Svenn -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/