X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1976D52C-72FE-4565-A09B-93AE522704E7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Pin mapping (separate symbols from mappings)
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <201510190242.t9J2gl7w009345@envy.delorie.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:05:36 -0600
Message-Id: <282EF9EF-E103-4101-BB56-A0A365AFFEBE@noqsi.com>
References: <20151018204010 DOT 9cce6a231dcc296256e187bd AT gmail DOT com> <201510181843 DOT t9IIhmWo025346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151018234424 DOT c0551dad9bef0859130239d9 AT gmail DOT com> <36B94694-F2AC-4A75-A8EB-40A1CE9A534C AT noqsi DOT com> <201510182225 DOT t9IMPkxK032763 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151019003814 DOT f62620bf0fec77e65104c105 AT gmail DOT com> <BED51F9A-F6FF-4A23-B18B-C2EC8BB9DAB6 AT noqsi DOT com> <201510190242 DOT t9J2gl7w009345 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_1976D52C-72FE-4565-A09B-93AE522704E7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Oct 18, 2015, at 8:42 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>=20
>> One geda-gaf issue is that the fundamental pin ID is
>> refdes/pinnumber, confused a bit by slotting. That would be very
>> hard to change, but I think mapping (original refdes)/(original
>> pinnumber) to (as-built refdes)/(as-built pinnumber) is possible.
>=20
> This fails if we switch to symbolic pins, which won't have "original
> pinnumber" any more.  Consider:
>=20
> http://www.delorie.com/pcb/symsym.html
>=20
> Which gate is "U1/pin-A" ?
>=20

Then you=92re talking about a *drastic* change to geda-gaf, or a new =
schematic toolkit entirely. But I don=92t see why a symbolic pin cannot =
have a number to identify it: it need not have anything to do with the =
physical pin.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_1976D52C-72FE-4565-A09B-93AE522704E7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=k8pn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_1976D52C-72FE-4565-A09B-93AE522704E7--