X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=oDz1U01pax2CTboPPz6WJ01wcwjXQbwNw9JZSjFHM7A=;
        b=LCj7zYXgjoxBvzw3beVGZzpFh055zMbR8aBf3o6La6B3TxrxcMMIuutbI/4uTDIJcH
         Tv25ZN/nnUdnPzBYo+vAwBxRbfq6nV1OgoZzOWWwosXBC7QP1CBeI+O9I9Gw+71U+vRe
         avhk94gsybE7zuU9nFKGRwfXP5KfECMjhfno3nGzuTSD9hmzSndc6ygvm0IYkJbBhUPg
         CC51F17R9KZxSjmGgH6OmFT+cfecI4ppZAX64btoZALwEbznXZpgabk7U+vbCRiWikKy
         BP7ZHuhXvjYfyAibE4zb6fUq5xhYw8bbyCMafZmyJubcfQYKoAEYaldZkmT73Ndffh36
         5QrA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.13.34 with SMTP id e2mr255493lbc.120.1444792969174; Tue,
 13 Oct 2015 20:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <28E68A64-515C-4BA2-802E-EC4F77D395D5@noqsi.com>
References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTMnybSnYgnNhVZGA6PTvyJu+=Kzd5LX2HMqxT1F4LoRg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTPPtqmWVa3=Kf-PeN+WS5Tn4J+D0Ri6R_4OrQOk+LFKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT8WzhwvzFx3Rfv8vN-f=i1=uWuLF+48VygSRtfdzdo-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhR+K+dvDdXsbk0Y6LN=-7RhhG5wvtG4i0k4+uMgzd=H0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<39FF6208-7D45-4DE8-9AEE-1ED1B512705B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhROpz_3y2JB=xEkEQ3CMHqHJ_WZxqVrbQhP4q2mg40h8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C8AC7729-F0BC-4CFA-95DA-65CCEF10EC4E AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTSPvQguBwNQRXEnkk5snEWxi0kTe-NXv3x42Xs6Q426Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<28E68A64-515C-4BA2-802E-EC4F77D395D5 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 03:22:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhTN9VsiL9fp67zDC1nQg4XcSJ7cyveEvRm7seeyhbjq+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t9E3MrAe029775
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:11 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> We already talked about scheme. As I recall you and I were in
>> agreement that scheme needed to be de-emphasized.
>
> But not replaced by patching the core! I didn’t mean we should implement high level features in low level code. Use a real high level language for that.

If you really believe in this statement ideologically we should remove
s_conn from the core and redo it in scheme.

I imagine most users will want to use flat nets and the new ones in
the same design just not for the same things. The new nets are for PCB
layout and the old ones are better for simplistic simulations.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/