X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=45y50owotvGReK4iroTSfIMl5qqoReF2IyH/qEogx2E=;
        b=MCgqKV1Zj6r77XlREoFKmP6EkvCEYdsArniQJotH9yHIzLwBIDvR80xKyXK7Bw2bOO
         SEpVNaEPygwLk3M5jd2ZW3cuu9ixz580K5z158K6GTzY9ofXKFWtlC4Sx9fv/XRJRwyv
         nNM5XtSRycQovyNiG1E8WZuU20lnTA3R24jhgPviolAu3njNaCoT0vPYTbvC744BOBsJ
         yDeLwGPH1qgTp28+Jm7H1GC/UGHxPkB5oQplLCOzDICmneaLRj4KbEmesRi0wEgabGdq
         drHXiY5mNhN/lqf5h04uAKdnQg5LYaNG2xHJ8pcXuCn8GUMSHkRWDtriEA9lEmOIZ3RD
         pgfQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.64.72 with SMTP id m8mr288305lbs.41.1444791363013; Tue,
 13 Oct 2015 19:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B4A88DFF-97D8-4391-9BC6-E4EA2EF4D69B@noqsi.com>
References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510121905 DOT t9CJ5T9W026297 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTMnybSnYgnNhVZGA6PTvyJu+=Kzd5LX2HMqxT1F4LoRg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<88EA58F5-2B23-498A-9E5B-84054976DBED AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTPPtqmWVa3=Kf-PeN+WS5Tn4J+D0Ri6R_4OrQOk+LFKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4D3CD563-D8EE-4B2A-975A-AC2B573960FF AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT8WzhwvzFx3Rfv8vN-f=i1=uWuLF+48VygSRtfdzdo-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhR+K+dvDdXsbk0Y6LN=-7RhhG5wvtG4i0k4+uMgzd=H0w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<39FF6208-7D45-4DE8-9AEE-1ED1B512705B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhROpz_3y2JB=xEkEQ3CMHqHJ_WZxqVrbQhP4q2mg40h8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C8AC7729-F0BC-4CFA-95DA-65CCEF10EC4E AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201510140229 DOT t9E2T45e021346 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<B4A88DFF-97D8-4391-9BC6-E4EA2EF4D69B AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:56:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhQCsY9+bKRtHYXTt_UTNzAMEa6em8HzLtB0oy6rMdhiAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t9E2u8W0026210
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:47 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:29 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> No, I assume that you don't know what might break the tools.
>>
>> Please don't assume the worst of people.
>>
>
> I don’t. I do assume that good people will make blunders. This is completely normal. I’ve made enough of them. Minimizing the opportunities for blunders is important.

Yet you talk like it would doom the suite when in reality it could
just be fixed.

Old workflows using the flat nets already have userbase that gets
priority in conflicts. The new nets have no users and we can change
them after an unstable release with out harming anyone's work. I
thought that was the point of unstable releases, branches and etc.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/