X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=91Af1qZvV/qu+eLX3uMXuRoJvdwkBxyPlsAn1wAve0U=; b=V7c2jjfd7XZ4XgAaBlx7sDLmBDYiHCw++YDDCd45aVWa1E1DE77Ylc6F+6Ht8JBI5b YcHdWowMIeEiJeSU38Kt2dokYOK3xWPNw4h9N/DbAhj3TRcA8u3aL5TC9LJudln5YBj6 k64fKM/jKqBLiJSq6hi/GFgHnV3TwbmI5r1RU9ZZF4VmNDuIk2cfdl+4HPr2I0+YuITz lH2bZbzMDwFxlOpHC1VOb836iKA5VnBj6uvYWlofoXYPpwh58oYqVVLFTSHz4TrDHzkV E/Zx4BZTC+3tRfhoMiznuROV4VtCS/PJlxncBdjgvWvh112Fdh1+xNZ3CZxsP1lz6mXi dg1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.63.67 with SMTP id e3mr5679945lbs.92.1443794426055; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 07:00:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201510020536.t925a5PK017417@envy.delorie.com> References: <0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <201510020536 DOT t925a5PK017417 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:00:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:36 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I disagree with the developer mailing list being separate. In my >> perception, this separation creates second class citizens. > > We used to have just one list. The non-devs wanted the dev talk moved. > > We switched to an open dev list. It was abused by non-devs. > > We switched to a closed dev list. The non-devs complained. > > After a while, we had no devs. Exactly how I see things. > Now we have one list (geda-user) for general discussion, and we happen > to have a few other mailing lists that generally have no discussion on > them yet seem to be a hot spot for everyone who isn't on them. > > You refer to "the developer mailing list" as if it's some magic land > where everything wonderful happens, but in reality it's just a list of > people with git commit privs. For years I had forgotten I was even on that list because no one said anything there. > We can't win. Exactly. > Just because the project is open source does not mean that everyone > has a right to be on every mailing list. There are some topics that > are too trivial to warrant scrutiny (minor server issues) and some > that should not be public for privacy issues ("people problems"). > > As for "second class citizens" it's unfortunate that you look at it > that way, it's a negative view, that someone who has acheived a goal > somehow diminishes all others. Certainly in any project there are > ranks of participants, ranging from admins down to the uninterested. > That most of the planet's population aren't admins doesn't make them > "second class" - it just means if they wish to be admins, they have > yet to earn it. Likewise for those who aren't developers, those who > aren't users, those who don't use computers, etc... I need to think about this. Something does not sit well with me. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/