X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=fo0sHEWU0Lt1MPJUkxfXecwZ6e3Zuk+OV8CemEfjGLo=;
        b=qHVKsqUu7dUIs+xLdUL5l/Rl2zXa0NX5r2L95hPE+Vvq04rf5A88gmguaHV62Ph1rL
         iuSieu39QWrwpThvQsQBEJ0EiCGNKCma50nhTA6USybcAuUm8XysUm5c86qN1t02cCfF
         hTC6gcpk3+4lJqVXvcZXmryRMvZa7jSdy6xrxtIIwx3rJG866ePOi4wGMeZhrhDMU72G
         vnUDpFtGVjxxSUMg3Dv/TuAB9uuYLLNJ0qBYJvdCFSGI0dn3iRuyKGEh+tC3ly2sCNM7
         G47YACuDsMkYKIFQZ2v8Jt6hHDJuoE4p6UiW7HCplKLFIQOkgFhgHUqRoGP8Nbc5qLAu
         RnxA==
X-Received: by 10.152.30.4 with SMTP id o4mr1512832lah.74.1433481819510;
        Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:23:36 +0300
From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Latest stable release
Message-ID: <20150605052336.GA3593@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References: <5570D00D DOT 9070206 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5570D00D.9070206@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Girvin.

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 03:24:13PM -0700, Girvin R. Herr (gherr375 AT sbcglobal DOT net) wrote:
> Greetings,
> A while back, someone told a poster that gEDA 1.9.1 was the latest stable
> release of gEDA/gaf.  I just looked on the download website
> 
>    http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:download
> 
> and 1.9.1-20140308 is still listed as unstable, with 1.8.2 listed as stable.
> Is 1.9.1 stable yet?

No, it is unstable but quite useful.

Cheers,
  Vladimir