X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 21:47:17 -0500 Message-Id: <201502040247.t142lHOM017606@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (message from Kai-Martin Knaak on Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:38:58 +0100) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Footprint Generator References: <1345A71A-1F70-4FCD-B738-883EA3C833E5 AT sbcglobal DOT net> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > A "footprint" or an "element" are not quite the same as in common > languages. footprint - the impression of something on a surface element - a component of a whole In PCB, the footprint is the pattern, where the element has all the additional information that makes it a unique portion of the whole design. You could argue that we use different terms than other EDA packages, but that only means we're different (or they're different), not wrong. > The notion of "solder side", "solder layer" and "component side" > coexists with "top side" and "bottom side". We're working on that one, we've been migrating to just top/bottom. This, however, is a case where everyone *did* use the same terms (component/solder) but had to diverge when SMT and multi-layer boards became the norm.