X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Yandex-Uniq: 6501b5c6-2343-4d5b-86bd-1b202e40a2e2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1387935132; bh=+VfwUfdjMhcZvUrXqGTwzHxZog5mQtbbstz7aVzHUpk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OBnYEca2Nym4IHP25LxTHTFOLFJ+XkLj97vUsBLFouKAyeWO/tQYL6hP2C7RKLO4k 9cR0TC0KibhkDNTR59AIb4CI8r52ZMGqVMFGgkNWmypf6+rrQ7nqYq4vsHPD898hs8 MnBFRAK9kxnl2SoO9MIvkx6FER+5WHlWD1Ow8trU= Authentication-Results: smtp18.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 07:32:08 +0600 From: Alexey Shaposhnikov To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] [PATCH] Customizable graphical elements Message-ID: <20131225073208.72bd1ae8@warrawoona.sti> In-Reply-To: <20131222124920.GA5820@localhost.localdomain> References: <20131213050140 DOT 4ae1f52c AT warrawoona DOT sti> <20131221143249 DOT GA31097 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20131222010634 DOT 2e9d5ba8 AT warrawoona DOT sti> <20131222124920 DOT GA5820 AT localhost DOT localdomain> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id rBP1WKsZ007854 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:49:21 +0400 Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: > It seems to me a cue in the connection point lets the user see > during schematic capture that the bus connection exists in the > point. Then it's already broken from, at least, version 1.62: http://i.imgur.com/GLJZamZ.png (How to reproduce: 1. Draw single bus with 90-degree turn; 2. Draw another bus and connect it to the turning point of first bus). And nobody cares about this. > > I think in a similar way, but there is a small problem: can't come up how to > > send these values to libgeda and libgedacairo functions. Now I see two > > possible ways: add argument to o_..._new and cue drawing function or add > > new properties for TOPLEVEL and EdaRenderer objects. And I dislike them > > both (due to obvious API changing). > > What's wrong with API changing? Can it break your workflow? :) No, something much worse: required volume of work. Especially because now (is I can see from sources) there is no "official" way to parse new config files at startup instead of rereading at every movement. -- С уважением, Алексей Шапошников.