X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=JmE0Ed6oevIbwgcDeEri2Mqq87fbprnopYm4tfGQMZs=;
        b=oWCXhxYQ3GZW1kfGAaH2CFhzLllL3iUVMSZ+2mLMwGR+eUYH8O+Obf46ZDTMAYfMOn
         FNtkDxWVbUeC2ycQbqM/CDNja3MkSdWsPaL/4i64d6+djJrFFYt5AY67h3De6WHJeIEc
         k0H8v7zhUlMI7YgJvHEfHui1PSGDRSkCVrY9CiJ7Q+5yDffpUD0W8hw6PJ/2hpTwMjOv
         ZyQ0ioZwCf9VhpAw1cs5jnoFnB0NfP4IDeN/WPqz8I06ttTOWY0DYc9LSMluPNb+NSfb
         V5wUahKr6jvyOVGK9sf8C1ZRZP1iHDw6DzWFnDK47pAQApFDoZdaSccHbmtG5C1jA7yW
         G/sg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.197.129 with SMTP id iu1mr1956065pbc.139.1381239286706;
 Tue, 08 Oct 2013 06:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhQxhRKpzWni0aG0pfA5Cp-Ch=Ghuw3sqT0hmm4hX8Y72Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM2RGhTKEi4GFb3_sYV8FJRfqr0GTzWfpk28vQ-bDLoQpjvXyQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAN0Jx-8gHgHBzzxFqsZssUjjygWqSJOCZ5jJvES91K7y6eUeLQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQxhRKpzWni0aG0pfA5Cp-Ch=Ghuw3sqT0hmm4hX8Y72Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:34:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhS896Ub3=jJ73V5K2Qw4iSfGfS6SCeVKQ0c3WR2kn6WAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] polygons, arcs and footprints
From: Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Thanks to all of you for the work you are putting into this problem. I
really did not figure this thread would get that much attention.

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> If your going to go about it that way then why use rectangles you
> could just as easily use stroke.
>
> I though arbitrary rotate of rectangles was not allowed in the pcb
> format. It does not work from the gui of the version I am using. Is
> that a bug?
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Russell Dill <Russ DOT Dill AT asu DOT edu> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I am trying to make a footprint for an LTC3441. The bottom pad is a
>>> polygon. I know they are not possible in PCB footprints but does
>>> anyone have a good way to emulation one?
>>>
>>> Also I am trying to use a MEMS microphone that uses a ring to seal it
>>> to the PCB. Again I know that does not exist but is there a way around
>>> it?
>>
>> A ring is a little more complicated, but here's an example of a funny
>> ring pad shape
>>
>>     w = dmath.sin(dmath.radians(angle / 2)) * 2
>>     h = m.radius * dmath.cos(dmath.radians(angle / 2))
>>     piece = pscad.up(h) + pscad.square((w + m.width, m.width),
>> rounded=True, center=True)
>>     ret = []
>>     for i in range(0, m.n):
>>         ret.append(pscad.rotate(i * 360 / m.n) + piece)
>>     return pscad.union() + tuple(ret)
>>
>> Attached is a single pad with the above pattern with n == 20, width ==
>> 0.1mm, and radius == 1.0mm.
>
>
>
> --
> Home
> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
> Work
> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/