X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=nerdshack.com;
  b=xDZSD7H82gcpl+6sh46qIOhu1x58oLLl0OJWVcEw0mGn0HTuiHB/PeO3/MeDJKJvzlNwdon5qRFmXO+VoZxqmqgcOT0qJnqTC6lweP/VfDE206ju3Z/kp3AN66MPaMszCT/EsV18MV9LKhVwOj/OgSVUnwhiE2l993ujn0rL4Ao=;
  h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:45:22 +0600
From: Alexey Shaposhnikov <avshap AT nerdshack DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [geda-user] Redundant drawing functions in libgedacairo
Message-ID: <20130724164522.311d7f3d@warrawoona.sti>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r6OAjYjO008630
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com


While hacking libgeda i found, that functions  eda_renderer_draw_line,
eda_renderer_draw_net, eda_renderer_draw_bus and eda_renderer_draw_pin in
libgedacairo actually repeat each other. The only difference is that the first
function takes the values for ​​line width, cap style, dash style and dash
length from object properties, while others use a hard-coded values (despite
all those properties can be set while creating pin, bus or net object).

Did i miss something?

-- 
With best regards, Alexey Shaposhnikov.