X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-SourceIP: 89.173.57.57 Message-ID: <51CAB45C.6000904@prochac.sk> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:29:00 +0200 From: Milan Prochac User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] LP699502-openscad-exporter References: <51CA371C DOT 10507 AT prochac DOT sk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gw-milan.doma.local Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 6/26/2013 4:08 AM, Markus Hitter wrote: > > > Really? > No, not really :) > In case your approach is entirely different, add it as a feature > branch, too. Then people can decide which one works better. > > In case it's a similar approach, put your features on top of Berts! > It's very different. It builds 3D model from graphical data pushed to filter by pcb, while Berts filter loops through elements on pcb layout. > > Especially I think exporters should give reasonable results by just > clicking through the dialog, which I think Bert ones doesn't, yet. In > todays world, people have a strong tendency to throw a tool away in > case it doesn't produce results on the first spot, no matter how > powerful it is with some knowledge. > The board itself with all details can be exported in few mouse clicks. To populate board with components requires extra effort, of course - at least to put proper footprint and model name into Description field (in case the component exists in some library). Milan > > Markus > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter > http://www.jump-ing.de/ > > > >