X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com Message-ID: <519ADF82.8090000@neurotica.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 22:44:18 -0400 From: Dave McGuire User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] ITEAD? References: <51970516 DOT 6040101 AT neurotica DOT com> <5199AB8C DOT 5060501 AT neurotica DOT com> <519AB9DC DOT 4060906 AT neurotica DOT com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 05/20/2013 08:51 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote: >> Should I have any concerns about "IP harvesting" with these Chinese >> outfits? (probably not with the Aussie gent, I'd assume..) > > It's always a possibility. > I've had the rather surreal experience of walking through a plant room > in China and seeing a PCA that I'd designed, but suddenly realising > that it wasn't my design but something derived from it. When I asked > about it, one of the engineers of our "partner" company was very happy > to explain how he'd modified it to give better linearity and how it > was so much cheaper for them to make it for themselves instead of > buying it from Australia ! > The management of the company I was working for didn't seem to care, > they said that my PCA was just a small component in a very big deal > and we shouldn't jeopardise that by making a fuss. This same company > went bust within two years, go figure. That's, umm, terrifying. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA