X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <51569EC2.4060408@estechnical.co.uk> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:13:54 +0000 From: Ed Simmons User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com CC: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] AutoCad compatible Linux application References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-As: ed AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 30/03/13 03:03, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Gareth Edwards wrote: > >>> Both are 3D modellers. By contrast, autocad is 2D only. >>> >>> >> AutoCAD has supported 3D modelling for at least 20 years. >> > There is an extension called "Mechanical Desktop" that allows for 3D > models. But the core application "autocad" is restricted to 2D. The > exension really felt like an after thought. It did not compare > favorably with CATIA, solid works and the like. So Autodesk pulled the > plug on autocad and built a 3D modeler from scratch: autodesk inventor > > This was in 1999. > autocad is still a viable 2D application. But when it comes to 3D it > has been superseeded in every way by the inventor. > > ---<)kaimartin(>--- Ahh! Why does this always happen on this list? Surely it's ok to suggest the names of suitable packages without going off on one...? Yes, I know qcad and librecad are forks of the same thing, I didn't feel this worth mentioning as both perform fine for my 2d cad needs. I'm fairly sure that Rob has got his answer without us running around in circles... Ed