X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:20:23 +0100
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary
Message-ID: <20121221232023.GA2329@visitor2.iram.es>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212150453530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
 <CAN0Jx-8mr2XmLHr7AzcTygk205H1H4_X1Y9VcQHw3zia5eGynQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAN-_CWyXNvnumf5OC+m-xRV0zMf3cCvyzLU3be_pC8DkNVZG0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <1355861174 DOT 13534 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost>
 <20121220101819 DOT GA26060 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
 <1356003432 DOT 4776 DOT 10 DOT camel AT localhost>
 <20121220122149 DOT GB20493 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
 <1356100339 DOT 17857 DOT 0 DOT camel AT localhost>
 <20121221173921 DOT GA25742 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
 <1356128362 DOT 2796 DOT 3 DOT camel AT localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1356128362.2796.3.camel@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SPF-Received: 2
X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details:   (-1.4 points)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.4 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:19:22PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 18:39 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:32:19PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 13:21 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I can believe it. I really considered your previous patch a regression,
> > > > but color differentiation is going forward.
> > > 
> > > Did you get a chance to try it out yet?
> > 
> > I was just trying but had a problem. Cloning the repository worked but:
> > 
> > git checkout for_master origin/for_master
> > 
> > as you said in a previous message failed!
> 
> What was the error message?

error: pathspec 'for_master' did not match any file(s) known to git.
error: pathspec 'origin/for_master' did not match any file(s) known to git.

> 
> What branches are listed with 
> 
> git branch

* pcb+gl

> 
> and
> 
> git branch -r

  origin/HEAD -> origin/pcb+gl
  origin/abstract_graphics_api
  origin/abstract_graphics_api.stgit
  origin/acy_resistor_model
  origin/anti-polygons
  origin/anti-polygons.stgit
  origin/bentley_ottmann_intersect
  origin/bentley_ottmann_intersect.stgit
  origin/butcher_crosshair
  origin/butcher_crosshair.old
  origin/butcher_crosshair.stgit
  origin/draw_api_idea
  origin/draw_api_idea.stgit
  origin/exporter_idea
  origin/exporter_idea.stgit
  origin/for_bdale
  origin/for_bdale.stgit
  origin/for_master
  origin/for_master.stgit
  origin/gerber_import
  origin/gerber_import.stgit
  origin/glist
  origin/glist.stgit
  origin/layer_selector
  origin/layer_selector.stgit
  origin/lesstif_gl
  origin/lesstif_gl.stgit
  origin/local_customisation_pcb+gl
  origin/local_customisation_pcb+gl.stgit
  origin/local_customisation_pours
  origin/local_customisation_pours.stgit
  origin/old_idea
  origin/old_idea.stgit
  origin/pcb+gl
  origin/pcb+gl.stgit
  origin/pcb+gl_experimental
  origin/pcb+gl_experimental.stgit
  origin/polygon_speedup
  origin/polygon_speedup.stgit
  origin/pours
  origin/pours.stgit
  origin/pours_with_anti_polygons
  origin/pours_with_anti_polygons.stgit
  origin/private_views
  origin/private_views.stgit
  origin/thermal-geometry
  origin/thermal-geometry.stgit

I'm using git 1.7.10.4, the one from Debian testing updated about 1 month
ago. Apparently I could simply type git checkout origin/for_master.
> 
> > I first tried to navigate the repository with "gitk --all" and got
> > lost: too many rebases.
> 
> --all is confusing for repositories using stgit, as there is a lot of
> churn in the .stgit branches.
> 
> I use a shell script I call "gitkall", contaning:
> 
> gitk $(git show-ref | grep -v ".stgit" | grep -v "patches/") $@
> 
> That filters out the stgit stuff.
> 
> 
> > However, the result of the clone includes the relevant patch
> > (the RATFOUND one), so I compiled and installed it.
> 
> You might have one of my own branches then... it probably contains a lot
> of other cruft which you won't want, including changes to mouse wheel
> bindings, experimental GL rendering etc..

Maybe, but it does not seem to affect the outcome. Actually
checking out "origin" and diffing with "origin/for_master" gives:  

41 files changed, 7430 insertions(+), 522 deletions(-)

from diffstat.

> Nice.. I'll have to make it a little bit more configurable, and figure
> out whether the "FOUND" flag should be applied to every object, or just
> the connected ones..., then I can push it.

I believe that it should be applied to every object.

	Regards,
	Gabriel