X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <201212140010.qBE0ABjV023762@envy.delorie.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:33:59 -0700 Message-Id: <85C45612-0C21-4983-9100-4CCB93E605FB@noqsi.com> References: <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <1355188647 DOT 12937 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <201212140010 DOT qBE0ABjV023762 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id qBE0Y4cV001879 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Dec 13, 2012, at 5:10 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> The lack of this sort of simple, commonsense organizing principle >> seems to me at the root of what I find so confusing about pcb. So, >> instead of having a trivial way to rigorously identify shorts, pcb >> will wind up with yet another complicated, unreliable, >> incomprehensible heuristic. > > Again, please stop using such emotionally charged words. Your > constant assumption that the developers are incompetent Why on Earth would you think I assume that? Please do not read more into my comments than is there. > and that our > efforts are doomed, Why would I post if I thought that? > Also, we've discussed net-tagging before, and it is not even close to > "trivial". > Can you explain why not? John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com