X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Message-ID: <1355441844.2993.3.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines From: Peter Clifton To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:37:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <50C8A51D.6060009@ecosensory.com> References: <20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <1355188647 DOT 12937 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost> <1355265114 DOT 18878 DOT 24 DOT camel AT localhost> <50C8A51D DOT 6060009 AT ecosensory DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 09:39 -0600, John Griessen wrote: > On 12/11/12 16:31, Peter Clifton wrote: > > It wouldn't be a big jump to > > generalise to giving each object a list of connected objects as well as > > a list of affects-geometry objects. > > > That, and leaving the info in the netlist would be a big leap in usability > for simulations. What kind of simulation are you thinking about? So far, we're discussing mods for PCB. We'd probably need similar in gschem / libgeda for simulations, no? (Or did you mean simulations relating to a PCB layout)? -- Peter Clifton Clifton Electronics