X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id
	:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; s=beta; bh=9WLi
	Cog2KRUinLzP46yoHU3umNHXb+0a0lWnDDFAmFw=; b=NaSBkaH9pATZ7uuxb34H
	RV7ldQW8+Q6gk+CfFtA/txiqWvharcfIl3/kO5eurqP4GPl0hCo+sY6xH31RD8QK
	vRMi7rNjxNxeI7OCBFqwOkqPAYa/+Llz4bIvdtt7z7E3xo5IZm0IMUvsz5FArYZj
	YmimTq/aSxAX55MMUa+vOUA=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <2CB304B5-9587-4734-84E4-49F464744D11 AT noqsi DOT com> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <0C271FD1-1893-4CFF-8C47-437A24F89D71@jump-ing.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: Pin hole size)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:23:47 +0200
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


Am 26.10.2012 um 09:00 schrieb Gareth Edwards:

> What I was trying to point out is that
> gaf has many known bugs with fixes ready to go that can't be applied
> to HEAD. Furthermore, since our last stable release, there have been
> 561 commits to  HEAD; these changes won't be appearing in downstream
> distributions until we release again. That's before we've even thought
> about future enhancements and features.
>
> In my opinion, both of these are due to lack of active developers with
> commit access, not because the software is stable - again, in my
> opinion, it isn't. It's just pretending to be.

This one! gEDA isn't finished & free of bugs. It can't be, because  
the electronics world as well as expectations in user interfaces are  
moving on.


Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/