X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:40:36 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-help AT delorie DOT com from="gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-help] Thank you verry much, next Idea - IPC proof In-Reply-To: <20170529105730.72ab2144@debian> Message-ID: References: <20170515111111 DOT 1ba62f47 AT debian> <20170516163211 DOT 2d920db6 AT debian> <20170529010708 DOT 29be8939 AT debian> <20170529022113 DOT GB12397 AT stuge DOT se> <20170529105730 DOT 72ab2144 AT debian> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-help AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-help AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 29 May 2017, Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I have the problem, that i have to justify the dimensions of footprint. > I must quote a normative. > > The IPC is the first that i know and that i can use. > My QA guy ask my for such a standard. I am happy to add features requested by active pcb-rnd users. As I said, an IPC-smt parametric footprint is cheap, I could do it in a hour or two. But it needs active user demand before I allocate time on it. 1. become an active pcb-rnd user 2. make your feature request 3. test the feature Please contact me in private if you are interested. Regards, Igor2