Message-ID: <002701c2ab3f$4e937090$0100a8c0@p4>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1021224075043 DOT 24775B AT is> <3E082692 DOT 244CF6CB AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject: Re: GDB 5.3 branch cut out
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 22:25:52 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1123
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > > I built from gdb-5.3.tar.gz off some GNU mirror in the UK. It built
fine.
> > > It have a non-empty readline/config.h file. This is against DJGPP CVS
> > > from a week or so ago with fileutils, sh-utils and textutils built
with
> > > the multiple-consecutive-slash patch for symlinks applied.
> >
> > On what platform did you build it?  If it's not W2K/XP, perhaps what
> > Andrew saw is specific to those systems?
>
> Yes, good point. I built on Windows '98 SE.
I did a get a few hours ago and am in the process of re-building all of the
GNU packages. LIBC built okay. On boxing day I may finish the testing and
let people know about GCC 3.2.1 and GDB 5.3 build results.

Andrew