Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:19:46 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <1190-Fri13Dec2002111945+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <20021212135449.GA4441@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT
	Williams on Thu, 12 Dec 2002 07:54:49 -0600)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: Release 4 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1]
References: <3DF7C2BD DOT 31601BA7 AT yahoo DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1021212075923 DOT 15584F-100000 AT is> <20021212135449 DOT GA4441 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 07:54:49 -0600
> From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
> 
> -: I think the case of Fileutils is quite unique.  Most (if not all) other 
> -: uploads don't have refreshes.
> 
> It's more common than one might believe; here are the multiple
> releases (refreshes only, i.e., >= r2) from my djgpp attic:
> 
> ./v2/zippo/0.1.6-r1
> ./v2/zippo/0.1.6-r2
> ./v2apps/xdelta/1.1.1-r2
> ./v2apps/xdelta/1.1.2-r2
> ./v2apps/xdelta/1.1.2-r3
> ./v2gnu/autoconf/2.50-r2
> ./v2gnu/autoconf/2.50-r3
> ./v2gnu/automake/1.5-r2
> ./v2gnu/bash/2.04-r2
> ./v2gnu/bash/2.04-r3
> ./v2gnu/bash/2.04-r4
> ./v2gnu/binutils/2.11.2-r2
> ./v2gnu/bison/1.29-r2
> ./v2gnu/bison/1.30-r2
> ./v2gnu/bison/1.32-r2
> ./v2gnu/fileutils/4.0-r2
> ./v2gnu/fileutils/4.0-r3
> ./v2gnu/fileutils/4.0-r4
> ./v2gnu/fileutils/4.0-r5
> ./v2gnu/fileutils/4.1-r2
> ./v2gnu/fileutils/4.1-r3
> ./v2gnu/fileutils/4.1-r4
> ./v2gnu/gcc/3.0.2-r2
> ./v2gnu/gcc/3.0.3-r2
> ./v2gnu/gdbm/1.8.0-r2
> ./v2gnu/gdbm/1.8.0-r3

That's a total of 9 packages out of some 50 or more.  Not bad for a
guess.