From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <10212121417.AA21834@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: Release 4 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1]
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:17:46 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <20021212135449.GA4441@kendall.sfbr.org> from "JT Williams" at Dec 12, 2002 07:54:49 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> -: I think the case of Fileutils is quite unique.  Most (if not all) other 
> -: uploads don't have refreshes.
> 
> It's more common than one might believe; here are the multiple
> releases (refreshes only, i.e., >= r2) from my djgpp attic:

And there have been 3 refreshes of djdev203 (and crx) also.

But we are talking a maintenance pit here.