Message-ID: <003a01c298cc$3198e810$0100a8c0@p4> From: "Andrew Cottrell" To: , "Richard Dawe" References: <000f01c2939b$5e7057f0$0100a8c0 AT p4> <3DE6444C DOT 4DF43DD0 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <011e01c29820$c4647ad0$0100a8c0 AT p4> <3DE880EA DOT 959EC55F AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Subject: Re: LIBC 2.04 new function atoll() and STDLIB long long changes Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 10:56:20 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1123 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1123 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Dawe" To: Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 8:12 PM Subject: Re: LIBC 2.04 new function atoll() and STDLIB long long changes > Hello. > > Andrew Cottrell wrote: > > > > > I've just noticed that the diff you sent does not include . > > > Could you send a diff for that too please? > > That's a bit of the problem in that atoll() is allready in > > > > I should have noted this in the original posting. > > We need to change the prototypes in to have 'long long int' instead > of 'long long', to match the C99 standard. I'll do that as part of committing > the patch. The CVS head has the definition of atoll as follows:- long long int atoll(const char *_s); No change is requried.