Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:33:32 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au Message-Id: <4634-Sat21Sep2002003332+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <002301c25fc3$62fc2b70$0100a8c0@p4> (acottrel@ihug.com.au) Subject: Re: Fw: Two rm.exe issues on XP References: <002301c25fc3$62fc2b70$0100a8c0 AT p4> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Andrew Cottrell" > Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:59:59 +1000 > > It looks like you may have missed the info in my posting below as rm.exe > from File Utilities 4.1 uses lstat and the change to fstat to produce the > inodes is very simple to do for the majority of files as indicated below as > well. Sorry, I didn't understand the change you propose. Can you show a patch or the new code?