Message-ID: <003f01c24f2b$caa82380$0100a8c0@p4>
From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To: "Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Cc: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10208290934270 DOT 20070-100000 AT ieva06>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.2 DJGPP beta build error
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:14:29 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > Thanks for this. So far the update looks okay with building GCC 3.2. It
will
> > get a thrashing over the next few days as I will be doing a number of
build
> > of allot of the DJGPP packages over the next few days.
>
> Andrew, have You tried generating gcc32s.zip (or some earlier version)
> using scripts and diffs from gcc32s2.zip and original gcc-3.2.tar.bz2
> (or gcc-3.2.tar.gz)?
No, I just take the source zip file that you produce. I find enough XP, misc
issues and build problems to keep me busy.

> Is it working under XP?
Bash 2.05b is working under XP with respect to now producing the libiberty.a
and configuring GCC 3.2, but I have not hit some issues with rm.exe (see
email to Richard & Charles , cc to djgpp-workers regarding two rm.exe issues
with XP.). I need to look at these as they are causing GCC 3.2 build issues
on my XP box.

Andrew

P.S. Once I get the GCC 3.2 re-build and build sorted out I will replace all
of the binary files at clio with updated or later versions.