From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200206152124.g5FLOte00215@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: Clio 2.04 packages
In-Reply-To: <10206151751.AA18505@clio.rice.edu> "from Charles Sandmann at Jun
 15, 2002 12:51:18 pm"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 23:24:55 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to Charles Sandmann:
> Why wasn't something like windows .lnk format chosen?  Why remove the 
> old EXE stubing type symlink - how to run these from command prompt?

(The .EXE stubbing is still there. It's not a symlink, though. IIRC,
when you want a stub calling some other program, you should create it
with stubify or something like that (unsure about the name). If you do
"ln -s" you'll get a symlink, and that's what you asked for, wasn't
it?)


Right,

						MartinS