Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:24:13 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: uclock() on Win2K
In-Reply-To: <10206100352.AA20367@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020610082321.21236I@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu wrote:

> On my Win95 box it doesn't work either - the timer seems to stay on
> rate generator (so it's not continuous); there are jumps in the time.

It worked for me on two Windows 9X machines.  So I guess this is 
version-dependent.

> Document as only reliable under DOS?

Yes, it seems like this is the best we can do.