X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: "Rajesh Vivekanandham" <r_vivekan AT satyam DOT net DOT in>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: COFF and MASM
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:10:44 +0530
Message-ID: <000001c1cb76$fd615b40$ba06d6d2@terax>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020314163756.20226B-100000@is>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Thank you.. Ijust checked the latest version of NASM which was released
recently.. Apparently it supports SSE.. 

Hurray:--)

-----Original Message-----
From: Eli Zaretskii [mailto:eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il] 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:09 PM
To: Rajesh Vivekanandham
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: COFF and MASM



On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Rajesh Vivekanandham wrote:

> But the DJGPP FAQ clearly says that u can use MASM 6.11 COFF output 
> with DJGPP...

Unfortunately, the FAQ is wrong.  Since the FAQ was last released, I've 
learned that MASM produces subtly incompatible COFF files.

> Is there any change between 6.11 and 6.15 COFF formats.. sounds like a

> very remote  possibility..

It probably always was like that, it's not something new.

> I HAVE TO BE ABLE TO USE MASM 6.15 as I need support for SSE ans SSE2 
> instructions which are not supported by NASM as of now

You can always use the opcode, can't you?