X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:46:27 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Default output format
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.10201211250290.12634-100000@ieva06>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020121134534.17842A@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> I think this should be considered as cleanup and I'm not sure we have to 
> revert this change (now it uses the defaults). So I suggest following
> change to linker script:
> 
> --- i386go32.x  Mon Jan 21 13:12:03 2002
> +++ djgpp-x.djl Mon Jan 21 13:08:01 2002
> @@ -16,10 +16,12 @@
>      djgpp_first_ctor = . ;
>      *(SORT(.ctors.*))
>      *(.ctor)
> +    *(.ctors)
>      djgpp_last_ctor = . ;
>      djgpp_first_dtor = . ;
>      *(SORT(.dtors.*))
>      *(.dtor)
> +    *(.dtors)
>      djgpp_last_dtor = . ;
>      *(.data)
>      *(.data.*)

Seems like a good idea.

> (perhaps the same also for lib/djgpp.djl

Yes, I think so.