From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200005201455.QAA21742@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: DOZE 3.x
In-Reply-To: <3925520D.D84383FE@inti.gov.ar> from salvador at "May 19, 2000 11:39:09 am"
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 16:55:53 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to salvador:
> Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> 
> > I've heard that we want to support DOZE versions as old as 3.something.
> >
> > 1. Why? Is that used still?
> 
> 3% of the people that visits my djgpp links pages still using Windows 3.x.

Yes, but I think you misunderstood my question. What version of DOZE
are they using (not which version of WINDOZE)?


Right,

							MartinS