From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
Organization: Darmstadt University of Technology
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 13:53:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: old binaries recompiled with djdev203
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54DE)
Message-ID: <32BAD842CE0@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

I would like to suggest the replacement of old binary packeges
(compiled with djdev201 and djdev202) with new binary packages
(compiled with djdev203).

These is a list of binary packages compiled with
libc.a versions prior to v 2.03:
  bc
  cpio
  ed
  enscript
  fileutils
  findutils
  flex
  gdbm
  gzip
  id-utils
  ispell
  m4
  cvs
  sed
  TeX/Web2c

I have reconfigured and recompiled the above packages
using bash203, gcc2952, binutils2951 and djdev203.
The new binaries have been tested running their testsuit
or same other tests. All new binaries work ok.

In the binary packages, I have substituted:
1) the binaries (striped).
2) headers and libraries (not striped).
3) shell scripts, if needed.
4) replaced raw man pages by formated man pages, if needed.
5) substituted emu387.dxe (24.01.97) by emu387.dxe (14.12.99)
   for all TeX binaries.
6) modified the manifest files, if needed.

I will wait some days for comments, suggestions, objections, etc.
If I get no response at all I will assume that there is no interest
at all and forget about this.

Regards,
Guerrero, Juan Manuel