Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 18:09:29 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Burton Radons <loth AT gec DOT net>
cc: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
        DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Regex patch
In-Reply-To: <35a75ba0.37737978@mail.cow-net.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980708180824.9581C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Burton Radons wrote:

> As you say, we could just get rid of the warnings with flags.  My
> patch does things at such a minor scope that it produces the same
> effect -- I'm just not letting the compiler guess.  Both paths are
> open -- DJ?
> 
> I like the warning flag option best.  Or, rather, I find it's
> advantages make it logically tolerable.

My vote is also to leave the warning options on and fix the sources.