From: Andrew Crabtree Message-Id: <199806302303.AA266257799@typhoon.rose.hp.com> Subject: Re: Some notes about DJDEV202.ZIP To: nate AT cartsys DOT com (Nate Eldredge) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 16:03:19 PDT Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: <359948A8.FE663AB1@cartsys.com>; from "Nate Eldredge" at Jun 30, 98 1:20 pm Reply-To: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com Precedence: bulk > This is probably pure evil, but we could go back to the old directory > tree scheme, where all libraries are in $DJDIR/lib, all includes in > $DJDIR/include, and abandon the special GCC tree. I don't like this at all. The new lib tree is just that, new. It is IMHO far superior to the old way. > I never did understand what was wrong with the old way. Big pain in the butt to have multiple compilers present. > but as Eli says, they'll have to hack DJGPP.ENV anyway.) Not anymore they won't. If I ever release the new pgcc snapshot it will install alongside gcc 2.8 and won't require changes to anything. Andy