From: Andrew Crabtree Message-Id: <199805262056.AA004086203@typhoon.rose.hp.com> Subject: Re: gcc/gas label problem To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 13:56:43 PDT Reply-To: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com Precedence: bulk > > different. First I applied the first patch you sent, and when I saw the - > > instead of _ I put it. But it didn't work Odd. I think it should have. Binutils 2.9 didn't change much. > so I simply commented out the local labels macro (a dirty patch ;-) That's all my patch did anyway :) > I aplied the patch Andrew sent to me and all worked Ok. Good. This sounds better. > The size of executables built with gcc-2.8.1 is still bigger than of ones > built with 2.7.2.1 even after stripping unneeded info. I think this is a problem in general. We are investigating size problems in pgcc as well. Andy -- _______ ___________________________________________________________ / Andrew Crabtree / Workgroup Networks Division ____ ___ / Hewlett-Packard / / / / Roseville, CA __/ __/ _____/ 916/785-1675 / andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com ___________ __/ _____________________________________________________