Message-ID: <3511910E.289D4654@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 22:41:34 +0100
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Organization: none provided
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT laima DOT acad DOT latnet DOT lv>
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Building gcc-2.8.1 for DJGPP
References: <199803191642 DOT SAA61616 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Andris Pavenis wrote :
> 
> file the reason was simple: I looked with names in gcc280s
> that ends with '~', but empty file x-go32.~ was missing, so
> I skipped it.

Thanks, that's now a bug of me.

> I also had to install gcc manually as install script didn't work

That's normal :-(

> correctly (it created directory '$DJGPP' instead of expanding
> $DJGPP and there were also other problems)

Maybe a

make install prefix=$DJDIR ...

works.

> Looks that libstdcxx.a generated by gcc-2.8.0 (from archive
> lgpp280b.zip) is incompatible with gcc-2.8.1:

That's now really bad. But currently I haven't the time
to check it.

> Is it significant to include suggested changes in exception handling
> under DJGPP when building GCC-2.8.1

If you mean the last discussion in djgpp-workers and if you
want to apply them only for yor own, then you should do. But
if you plan to make the DJGPP port gcc 2.8.1 then you should
wait (or discuss also) until we came to a final solution.

Robert