Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 08:54:47 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Ned Ulbricht <nedu AT ee DOT washington DOT edu>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Portability section for libc docs
In-Reply-To: <199802151950.LAA06834@mailhost1.cac.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980216085435.339B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 15 Feb 1998, Ned Ulbricht wrote:

> Well what is the definition of the 'Unix' column heading going to be? 
> A reasonable compromise might be to throw out 'Unix' and have 'BSD' 
> and 'SysV'.

Nate will have to decide on that.  Personally, having more than a
single column seems too gross.  I don't think DJGPP's libc has too
many functions whose Unix brethren differ between flavors of Unix, and
names like BSD and SysV will confuse people who don't know anything
about them (e.g., Linux is neither).