From: khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP compatability with Win95....
Date: 26 Dec 1997 05:08:20 GMT
Organization: Center for X-ray Lithography, UW-Madison
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <67ve44$1bmq$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References: <34A16352 DOT CFE81800 AT net1plus DOT com> <O24CEUZE9GA DOT 328 AT upnetnews04>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modi.xraylith.wisc.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <O24CEUZE9GA DOT 328 AT upnetnews04>,
DeHackEd <dehacked72 AT nospam DOT hotmail DOT com> wrote:
>    In Windows95 DOS boxes, it works very well (compiling is even faster and
>better at times). If you mean writing a program to run as a Windows 95 program,
>you will need some new files. I don't code in Windows, so I don't know, but
>there are some Win95 compilers based on GCC. Don't remember the web page off by
>heart though.
>

Besides RSXNTDJ, there are a few others:

Cygnus Gnu-Win32: This comes with a post-2.7.2 version of the compiler.
    http://www.cygnus.com/misc/gnu-win32/ 

EGCS port to Win32 (both cygwin32 and mingw32): Bleeding edge.
    http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32/

cygwin32 implies that you need Cygnus' Gnu-Win32 POSIX emulation layer,
whereas mingw32 uses MS-supplied C runtime (get ANSI, lose POSIX). Quite
possibly not as stable and mature as DJGPP, but getting better every day.

Mumit