Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4856
From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Why are they so fat?
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 13:59:18 CDT
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <31bdc206.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 960611113524 DOT 4911C-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> The smallest program you can produce with DJGPP v2 is 16KBytes (without
> compressing with DJP).

Not entirely true - if you write your code in GAS and don't use the libc
you can write a 2500 byte djgpp hello world type program.  Pretty useless
to jump into PM for a 500 byte program, but small can be done if you want
to abuse yourself.

Hell, for that matter, if you want to use DJASM you can write a 1000 byte
program.  But as Eli has pointed out before at least 100 times, this is
a silly thing to compare.  If you want to write 5Kb programs, go get a 
16-bit compiler and get a life elsewhere.  Since disk space is about 
15 cents per Megabyte anymore, you figure out how much bandwidth was 
just wasted over a penny.