Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 02:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Samuel Vincent <svincent AT cs DOT sonoma DOT edu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GNU question.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960426103039.26200C-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.960426021340.17355B-100000@zippy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 26 Apr 1996, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, Samuel Vincent wrote:
> 
> > > Tom Powell writes:
> > >  > I am a little confused about the license involved with DJGPP. 
> >
> > You don't need to release source code.  You only have to make available
> > your code in object format so people could relink it with their
> > own djgpp libraries if they want.
> 
> That is WRONG!  Programs compiled with DJGPP do not, repeat NOT, require 
> the author to distribute anything except the binary executable.  Please 
> do not make this issue more confusing than it is.  There are a few 
> SPECIAL cases (explained in the FAQ and in the recent postings by DJ 
> himself) where you use GNU (not DJGPP, GNU!) libraries, and which require 
> to make a linkable object files available.  But in general, this is NOT 
> required.  For details, please read Chapter 19 of the FAQ list.

Well.. what I had meant was if you used the GNU c++ libraries...
I was unclear because I was tired when I wrote that.. sorry to confuse 
you more... ;)   So you have nothing to worry about unless youre using 
libg++.a...  If you are.. you simply make an object file someone could 
relink with their own libg++.a...  It's that simple..

-Sam