Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <035401c0c3a8$0c3ed3e0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <02b501c0c3a6$4f7acfd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010412192533 DOT D20863 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: snapshot and new test gcc? Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:26:47 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2001 23:20:05.0009 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B39A010:01C0C3A7] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 9:25 AM Subject: Re: snapshot and new test gcc? > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:14:21AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >If possible could you do a new test-build of gcc with posix threads > >enabled? > > Um. No. I don't want to do this. I have no extra cycles available for > experimenting with gcc. I am also not going to release a version of gcc > with a reliance on a snapshot even if it is a test version. That's fine. I'll ask on the users list for the adventurous to give us some feedback then in combination with the snapshot. That way we will have some understanding of what'll happen once the pthread code is in a released cygwin dll. Rob > > cgf >