Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 18:14:26 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53t) Business Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: convey Information Systems GmbH X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <16632121828.20011207181426@familiehaase.de> To: Mark Bradshaw CC: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: whois package In-Reply-To: <911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D2874@cnmail> References: <911C684A29ACD311921800508B7293BA037D2874 AT cnmail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hallo Mark, 2001-12-07 18:05:12, du schriebst: > Going back to dig and host, I'm guessing that the maintainer would need to > actually be a maintainer for the whole bind package? Am I right in assuming > that having bind as a cygwin package would provide libresolv functionality, > or would more be required. No just the resolver is needed to build the tools, I can query every NS so the named isn't required and I think my 'native' Windows DNS Server is much faster. > BTW, I can get bind 9.2 to compile with some modification.... Great. But there are some problems here. If bind installs in /usr there are some files which collide, netdb.h, sys/cdefs.h, arpa/inet.h. A possibility to resolve this would be a split into runtime and devel version, or the headers needs to be merged which is the better choice IMO. On the other hand, the best would be to have a libresolv included with the C lib or resolver functions in cygwin itself so bind isn't needed. Gerrit -- convey Information Systems GmbH http://www.convey.de/ Vitalisstraße 326-328 Gerrit P. Haase D-50933 Köln gerrit DOT haase AT convey DOT de Fon: ++49 221 6903922