DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 651K5TRb3824932 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 651K5TRb3824932 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=rqF+dFl5 X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7146B4BA2E2B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1780344328; bh=a0Y9t07bCrnIgvfMrSSxgy0Niw58fN8EZNkBZJQwswU=; h=To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=rqF+dFl5+iGiG02tvB/SAs0xYtybNsRGs9CQba4VdnWNwFt8mR5CMsaK+PsxnSx8i ukmMpi5iCsix1FBBQu9WldBAoHxne8lF8P4QWwFMnuY55QREoQQZIEKQ2OOS+8J0AN kYCTGCtvui6l6JozVfk45u3nn9mH6haWDINn2Vgo= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 609004BA2E09 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 609004BA2E09 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1780344277; cv=none; b=IfTa/h3XruoovfK7B3YeGb6TQiTkSLLjARbriH7WvuDdcopvJhGnKCYJ6otIHgbYGFuQwfOCpvAYwa7zjE2pNNfYLncefL34bA3zJWmNZrUimHIu/s5ZJVz2J8qSliP2rVu+AzItBZkBY9MnGwYLS2NVEm00CHADoMrB2VNv5M8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1780344277; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cA1Y75/z6wA7chnemx/b8f0iIh5GtGSXF50RUzAskC8=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=RnDUT2VYwWa5lprO8A/Iv4dgaMce4htKzie9JfvdU3UPsSQs/EDBkhNgtOmdSs/g82S1GD9AsIrKUb77IPECZedn6g0jwHAwZuDUZ41m+bdh8QnVmkUiCcvWEMOsoIYVEauTuoiUNnBkHB9lYFnqUAYMhi2QJKGeoG6y9tG8PAc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, secure) header.d=nexgo.de header.i=@nexgo.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=vfde-mb-mr2-23sep header.b=ep87roJN DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 609004BA2E09 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: wcwidth broken with gcc 16 In-Reply-To: <5c46f199-128c-4409-a354-9d3e1deb29bb@towo.net> (Thomas Wolff via Cygwin's message of "Mon, 1 Jun 2026 10:13:01 +0200") References: <874ikpawdk DOT fsf AT Gerda DOT invalid> <8ff2ab8d-dfdc-459c-96f3-ed4a4f451440 AT towo DOT net> <0140C1F4-CA22-46DE-AE21-69C5427C59B5 AT unified-streaming DOT com> <4f885156-7772-43d7-ab72-c88f0a7d1e52 AT towo DOT net> <112594ad-3c25-4dad-b1bc-071b4951ed98 AT towo DOT net> <97f0f3c6-9f2c-429c-aa8e-875b7806b275 AT towo DOT net> <8733z9jpfj DOT fsf AT Gerda DOT invalid> <87pl2bab08 DOT fsf AT Gerda DOT invalid> <2a39e204-bd8b-4511-bd34-703899600e9e AT towo DOT net> <87ldcza133 DOT fsf AT Gerda DOT invalid> <21ca1d38-7b82-49af-b954-b83141237843 AT towo DOT net> <5c46f199-128c-4409-a354-9d3e1deb29bb AT towo DOT net> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 22:04:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87y0gyyqm2.fsf@Gerda.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-purgate-server: smtpa05 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 2274 X-purgate-ID: 155817::1780344270-9FCD2F46-325BB408/0/0 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: ASSI via Cygwin Reply-To: ASSI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Thomas Wolff via Cygwin writes: >> Which part of "you must not change a standard public API" is unclear to you? > Who defines that? Reference? After all, it would be a compatible > extension, not the most unusal thing to do. It makes a difference on Cygwin because wchar_t and wint_t are not the same width (and wchar_t is not supposed to be signed anyway even if they were). >> Especially when it would make things binary incompatible? > I don't see any incompatibilites that might arise on cygwin. Exactly the same one that had you open a bug for gcc: a compiler that uses wchar_t for the argument does not need to care about any upper bits left in the register that will go into the function and the function call (taking a win_t) does. Whether there actually are any binaries that have this problem is left as an exercise for the reader, but the mere possibility for one to exist makes this a no-go. >> WCHAR_MAX is 0xffffu on Cygwin, so the above is illegal input to wcwidth and it never worked. > Well, my proposal was just to make it work. But you may well argue it > doesn't need to. Again, there is no existing code that can produce such a result (given how wchar_t is currently defined and was from the very beginning), so there is nothing to fix. And you can't change it without invalidating existing binaries. > If you patch wcwidth.c as you suggest, make sure however *not* to > bit-reduce __wcwidth because that would break wcswidth which must > continue to work for non-BMP characters passed as surrogate pairs. Nobody ever suggested that. IIRC the internal function __wcwidth that is called through the stub implementation has always been taking a wint_t. I don't know if there's a precedent for an additional API function (most certainly not POSIX) that exists on systems that have the same characteristics as Windows (and Cygwin) of wchar_t not quite large enough to fit all codepoints in order to enable that functionality via either a wint_t or some additional unsigned wchar-like type. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q+, Q and microQ: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple