DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 60J8sHmN4023012 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 60J8sHmN4023012 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Q2LpaBbu X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E2684BA9018 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1768812856; bh=zQZSrRfJxNCeoy0Pn3TVVVDaTaW8YEsVF1P5/zjzggs=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=Q2LpaBbuyCmPAmRDu/1NrEURlJvvfX7hD0NkcnN5/CrdnBqT/4DXqOjhgNwmcA13P p8KiF6BlEM237dmr3zQzYGJlNUY6e0OYW9tayVq7DJNrpegK4rQlwftCpY6sVJviNj s5RggnA7OAEMaHlXVfKrLjrw8zftE9iKKG5gI3ZY= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0F2804BA2E22 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0F2804BA2E22 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1768812806; cv=none; b=uBMuhY6PvWMJaF0OnI1UEmPLlmKmsql3uVV9KYKi5BkdFdjAjPhWEwvscRinh+oVxVpXHivYILoT7NTo1ZZTRdKQMDSKyKOq8Pl7OqGm3hVossXMAG6cOMGo2CJIXZth2P+cVyTN/WF6WQ3hngKgufTE3LEqYIhRuz5WCCgLxJ8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1768812806; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kRlW1IMkePVBdXrzvQImfbBsMqBVmXkW4MfsWuuuids=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=rC+/iXHLwpMrUSsjnzyJsgKhR1//8Pga+Iz8QDvIzYssfkuI8fC3iabPVKSSWPSjdIOSKeiu2/T0JrWH4TI7ajmjJwmXL1yYPLh4gQyuy564o8LhZnRtnZrEHHLVNT9huT0f5Z5uIg4jVJkO2r+2lKfh3MeJyiG/M0jEU0TUmt4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F2804BA2E22 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NspuSPf4SZCMy/hqDRLPKQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6ZnK2ZhdSXqu/Bd6GwHbrw== Received-SPF: SoftFail (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of Paul DOT Zimmermann AT inria DOT fr is inclined to not designate 152.81.2.78 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=152.81.2.78; receiver=mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="Paul DOT Zimmermann AT inria DOT fr"; x-sender="Paul DOT Zimmermann AT inria DOT fr"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 include:mailout.safebrands.com a:basic-mail.safebrands.com a:basic-mail01.safebrands.com a:basic-mail02.safebrands.com ip4:128.93.142.0/24 ip4:192.134.164.0/24 ip4:128.93.162.160 ip4:128.93.162.3 ip4:128.93.162.88 ip4:89.107.174.7 mx ~all" Received-SPF: None (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster AT araignee) identity=helo; client-ip=152.81.2.78; receiver=mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="Paul DOT Zimmermann AT inria DOT fr"; x-sender="postmaster AT araignee"; x-conformance=spf_only X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,237,1763420400"; d="scan'208";a="136359244" Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 09:53:24 +0100 Message-Id: To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3c56778a-870c-4bae-a855-6b96392870c8@SystematicSW.ab.ca> (message from Brian Inglis on Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:43:21 -0700) Subject: Re: Log2 seems inefficient References: <226987210 DOT 591128 DOT 1768766440723 AT connect DOT xfinity DOT com> <3c56778a-870c-4bae-a855-6b96392870c8 AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca> X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Paul Zimmermann via Cygwin Reply-To: Paul Zimmermann MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Hi, > With default settings the worst case error in nearest rounding mode is 0.547 ULP > with inlined fma and fma contraction. > It uses a 1 KB lookup table, > ... > Note that the math.h header defines log2(x) to be log(x)/Ln2, this is > not changed, so the new code is only used if that macro is suppressed." > > Paul Zimmerman regularly posts library math function comparisons on the newlib > and comparable library mailing lists, available at: > > https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf > > that should give you an idea of the current state of the functions, if he is > even aware of the issue. indeed, the known worst case error for Newlib log2 is 2.06 ulp: log2 0 -1 0x1.68d778f076021p+0 [2] [2.06] 2.05526 2.055255219183752 libm gives 0x1.fb1b88680e7adp-2 mpfr gives 0x1.fb1b88680e7abp-2 The 0.547 value above could match the GNU libc worst error: log2 0 -1 0x1.1406d79e1b574p+0 [1] [0.548] 0.547538 0.5475371438132311 libm gives 0x1.bd16a11d3404ep-4 mpfr gives 0x1.bd16a11d3404fp-4 If your goal is accuracy, you can try the CORE-MATH implementation: https://gitlab.inria.fr/core-math/core-math/-/blob/master/src/binary64/log2/log2.c It takes 19 cycles on average on an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700, and is correctly rounded (for any rounding mode). Paul -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple