DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 60I7ke2P3476289 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 60I7ke2P3476289 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=hiXOhyzj X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 879A54BA23EE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1768722399; bh=ljeHpF1oC7QukE0LxqkPX/QD6QwuXJqAkHs6nF/BB20=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=hiXOhyzjvCVNkErl66TiW1TSq2wLpOzTXCu0c2HCUcCFz0pU5VcmAPcqsc9AMulBw hfVkuMitO4U75bO8CqAmj7Cm6uSRb2fyLQgULkmzwLa8Gz53HHc2BEbowVCmQOOLu0 bO6eK9cmAQg0gKmcVOZ8IfvOQebwDDt0Xq6TgMVg= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 74D634BA2E3D ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 74D634BA2E3D ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1768722347; cv=none; b=hcjadZ4iOFTEYt6WHTlfamQHIsy0HNsJiabyXb2LYIywdO4LulPk/zO+pnPnnusCsPsv7FBRwDpBeglMM6VCZv3Ffn8x1Fh97gBXZDfxclnwo93hPv4SrC6foQo3mpDAPM8MWl5KKLxEPxhU5hn6zzv03QwU/cUImOOTC1Mbbu8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1768722347; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PDtZSskf3WdFv8XB4KZoMHBPUMz3lOGsnfR+80VuKvg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature; b=VMYJL/1fe57a85eil9wpELX0vPbzojrkKY5S5awn/Jizgz7fFMdN0dP3V0UAlLniSfmUwiLo31orRAl5xyau3hRKiQ3aLcsgQMlDAuluEwHbEhvOJke6Mu92HpNDBiPPllnd+1Axj/S6igqeBm42fwUL5WA7djrGj3uo3CcraL0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 74D634BA2E3D Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:45:44 +0900 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Request to update libc++ related packages for current Clang/LLVM toolchain Message-Id: <20260118164544.346bdad89e67eec6fd054d95@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <1768690885668.2039852652.2136123419@gmail.com> References: <20260115215321 DOT 2bc9368897b5b60557bd2485 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <1768690885668 DOT 2039852652 DOT 2136123419 AT gmail DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin Reply-To: Takashi Yano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Sun, 18 Jan 2026 00:35:37 +0000 kikairoya via Cygwin wrote: > 2026年1月15日 21:53:21 (+09:00) で、Takashi Yano via Cygwin さんが書きました: > > The resulted a.exe will be free from libgcc_s. Please try. > > > > > Using compiler-rt instead of libgcc_s requires extra attention in Cygwin, > because the emulated TLS functionality implemented in compiler-rt can't > share the storage across DLL boundaries. Thanks for pointing this out. The comment in the emutls.c explains that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/emutls.c#L378-L389 Do you think this is a defect we should accept? -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple