DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 56VHmPZg3112529 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 56VHmPZg3112529 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=n5BcSEKv X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 088A93858C54 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1753984104; bh=ITQowgROzv90eBe+7kSAMWxnuegyon7RqpBvuSKdLzw=; h=To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=n5BcSEKvu7m3t6dnHe5NCjeyNAQYNqJGteW2oklBg/eqBMVhGIxDgLJspHunI3agK qPcxwC0jwF0+azkMaS30cLCe/9UCwbivXhSoi6otQbEn0+TzXlNg8GAxwiOT4QS8/T bMG72N4UMlZO0h6an8r8bO965Sv3onF4dUaI3HlA= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6CB313858CD1 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 6CB313858CD1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1753984079; cv=none; b=xYxswOJ17RBAeR5ANrJI/QCFf+IYeTIhdVMS5FtUWyHP6gGAGwb9RANJcj6+mitILdVMj4OfDz3DCUxwQQWDMW6EMjs/QVIVwmfFR6coFq0xDaDM7Ixr4sCUIHZ5t2dHLVGp0hOUSO2NkdxLF2mhh0ewzkdZx3vGljEmsGBg8xY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1753984079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=M1bolc83+VmCLo52Cy2LGj/fYfitq7Ahs/JwhQY4F0s=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=LcHChbbHD16AaxR5TrWzBLe+ku4qBLbzrj0YW+TlgWWxvlGSYmOn1jU6gX9xVnhpHGspSRpuCv/cWqrFXwxSsU5KzQyhN5gamVUvfB1GVXfsIMyAcvdYlHDNUenkoVl+nHa+Lqv2scIl91PUNVfrDNP90pe5oH0yr5frnCevcKg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6CB313858CD1 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setfacl(1),getfacl(1) testing in CI? In-Reply-To: (Lionel Cons via Cygwin's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:55:42 +0200") References: Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 19:47:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87tt2s9rr3.fsf@Gerda.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 582 X-purgate-ID: 155817::1753984074-015D1CD1-28D9A10F/0/0 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: ASSI via Cygwin Reply-To: ASSI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Lionel Cons via Cygwin writes: > I was thinking about a *FUNCTIONAL* test, because the > setfacl-does-not-work-for-dirs bug in Cygwin caused MASSIVE disruption > here, and I don't want to see THAT particular bug EVER again. And for you, too: if you're (cross-)posting to the developers mailing list you are expected to come with a patch and not just general cluelessness. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple